COVID-19 severity and vaccination effect in persons with MS treated with alemtuzumab

Introduction: While there is evidence that persons with MS (pwMS) treated with anti-CD20 are at higher risk of severe COVID-19 and lower levels of antibodies after vaccination, there was no emerging evidence of an effect of alemtuzumab on COVID-19 severity and response to vaccine. However, small samples were analysed. Objective/Aim: To evaluate COVID-19 severity, disease characteristics, and response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of pwMS treated with alemtuzumab. Method(s): We evaluated the subgroup of pwMS treated with alemtuzumab enrolled in the nationwide MuSC-19 and CovaXiMS studies. MuSC-19 was a retrospective study of pwMS with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 and CovaXiMS was a prospective study evaluating the antibody levels pre- and post-vaccination in pwMS. Result(s): Forty-four pwMS treated with alemtuzumab (mean age 36 years, 71% female, 91% relapsing-remitting MS, mean interval since last infusion 730 days) had COVID-19 between March 2020 and December 2021. Seven (16%) were asymptomatic and the rest had mild disease, with no hospitalization nor ventilation required. In the CovaXiMS study, 34 pwMS (mean age 38 years, 74% female, 100% relapsing-remitting MS, mean interval since last infusion 784 days) were last treated with alemtuzumab before the two doses of mRNA vaccine (26 Pfizer, 8 Moderna). Of these, 23 (68%) received their last infusion < 2.5 years before vaccination. The antibody level 4 weeks after the second dose was high (median=4203 U/mL, range=484-8662) and comparable to levels achieved in pwMS treated with other DMTs except anti-CD20 and fingolimod. Antibody levels were not correlated to the time since last alemtuzumab infusion (r=0.14, p=0.42). All had 6 months of follow-up and no breakthrough infections were observed. Conclusion(s): There is no evidence of any increased risk for severe COVID-19 in pwMS treated with alemtuzumab. In these patients, humoral response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was high and comparable to those treated with other DMTs or untreated.

Factors associated with infection and hospitalization due to COVID-19 in Nursing professionals: a cross-sectional study

Objective: to identify factors associated with infection and hospitalization due to COVID-19 in nursing professionals. Method: a cross-sectional study carried out with 415 nursing professionals in a hospital specialized in cardiology. The sociodemographic variables, comorbidities, working conditions and issues related to illness due to COVID-19 were evaluated. Chi-Square, Fisher's, Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney and Brunner Munzel tests were used in data analysis, as well as Odds Ratio for hospitalization, in addition to binary logistic regression. Results: the rate of nursing professionals affected by COVID-19 was 44.3% and the factors associated with infection were the number of people living in the same household infected by COVID-19 (OR 36.18;p<0.001) and use of public transportation (OR 2.70;p=0.044). Having severe symptoms (OR 29.75), belonging to the risk group (OR 3.00), having tachypnea (OR 6.48), shortness of breath (OR 5.83), tiredness (OR 4.64), fever (OR 4.41) and/or myalgia (OR 3.00) increased the chances of hospitalization in professionals with COVID-19. Conclusion: living in the same household as other people with the disease and using public transportation increased the risk of infection by the new coronavirus. The factors associated with the hospitalization of contaminated professionals were presence of risk factors for the disease, severity and type of the symptoms presented.

MICROCIRCULATION AND SARS-COV-2 INFECTION: A FOLLOW UP STUDY

Objective: SARS-CoV2 infection can lead to several clinical scenarios, named COVID-19, ranging from mild manifestations to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), coagulation alterations and endothelial dysfunction. The functional impairment of the microcirculation seems play a key role in the pathophysiology and clinical consequences of COVID-19. However, to date there is no evidence of structural microvascular damage related to COVID-19. Design and method: The aim of this study is to investigate microvascular alterations by adaptive optics and vide-ocapillaroscopy in patients recently admitted for COVID-19 and re-evaluated one year later. Methods: We enrolled 153 patients admitted between February and April 2020 at the Hospital of Montichiari (Brescia) and at the Internal Medicine Department of ASST Spedali Civili - University of Brescia for respiratory failure due to SARSCoV2- related interstitial pneumonia. Patients were evaluated two months after nalysed sation and after one year. All patients underwent a venous blood sampling for hematochemical tests, evaluation of retinal arteriolar morphology by adaptive optics, assessment of basal and total capillary density (BCD and TCD respectively) at the dorsum of the fourth finger of the non-dominant hand by videocapillaroscopy. Results: Fifty patients with completed follow-up were nalysed. An increase of internal lumen (93.8 ± 13.3 vs. 97.3 ± 14.2 micron, p < 0.001) and a reduction of wall to lumen ratio (WLR 0.30 ± 0.03 vs. 0.27 ± 0.03, p < 0.001) were observed at the follow up visit after one year (Figure). No significant differences were observed in BCD in the dorsum of the finger after one year, whereas a significant reduction in TCD was observed (p < 0.001). Microvascular changes were independent of body mass index and the presence of hypertension or diabetes mellitus. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this study show that patients with SARSCov2 infection present an improvement of microvascular structure after one year from the disease, such as a reduction in WLR of retinal arterioles. This suggests that COVID19 might induce structural alterations in the microcirculation which contribute to vascular damage. These changes do not seem to be influenced by the weight, presence of hypertension or diabetes.

Enoxaparin in COVID-19 moderate to severe hospitalized patients (INHIXACOV19)

Background : COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) is associated with High rates of thrombosis in hospitalized patients leading to varying pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis use based on rapidly changing societal guidance, institutional protocols from local expertise, and geographic patterns of practice. Aims : To assess the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 infection. Methods : Phase II single-arm interventional prospective study including all patients treated with the study drug and an observational prospective cohort study including all patients screened for receiving the study drug but not included in the phase II study. Each patient was followed-up for a minimum of 90 days after COVID19 diagnosis. Patients included in the interventional study received subcutaneous enoxaparin in a single daily dose of:60 mg once daily in case of body weight of 45 to 60 kg 80 mg per day in case of weight from 61 to 100 kg or 100 mg once daily in case of bodyweight >100 kg for 14 days, with dose adjustments on the basis of anti-factor Xa activity monitoring. Patients included in the observational cohort received standard thrombo-prophylaxis with subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg/die. Primary outcomes were all-cause in-hospital 30-day and 90 mortality rates. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients in the severe or critical stage of disease at the end of treatment, proportion of patients who developed major and non-major bleeding events and thromboembolic complications, time to first negative RT-PCR on nasofaringeal swab, reduction of viral load in blood. Results : Recruitment of 100 patients enrolled phase II single-arm interventional prospective study has been completed, while the recruitment of 200 patients in the observational prospective cohort study is ongoing. Conclusions : Full results will be available by June 2021.

Effect of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in multiple sclerosis patients treated with disease modifying therapies

Introduction: In patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) disease- modifying therapies (DMTs) are known to affect immune response to antigens and possibly to SARS-CoV2 vaccine. Therefore, post-vaccination serological assessments are needed to evaluate the effect of the vaccine on SARS-CoV-2 antibody response. Objectives and aims: We designed a prospective multicenter cohort study enrolling pwMS who were scheduled for SARSCov- 2 vaccination with mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2, Pfizer/ BioNTech, Inc or mRNA-1273, Moderna Tx, Inc) to evaluate their effect on SARS-CoV-2 antibody response. Methods: A blood collection for the measure of SARS-CoV-2 antibody before the first vaccine dose and 4 weeks after the second dose was planned, with a centralized and blinded serological assessment (electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, ECLIA, Roche Diagnostics). Results: Preliminary data were collected on 780 pwMS (76% BNT162b2 and 24% mRNA-1273) who had pre- and 4-week post-vaccination blood assessments. 87 (11.2%) were untreated, 154 (19.7%) on ocrelizumab, 25 (3.2%) on rituximab, 85 (10.9%) on fingolimod, 25 (3.2%) on cladribine and 404 (51.7%) on other DMTs. 677 patients (86.8%) had detectable post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. At multivariate analysis, the antibody levels of patients on ocrelizumab (178-fold decrease, p<0.001), fingolimod (26-fold decrease, p<0.001) and rituximab (17-fold decrease, p<0.001) were significantly reduced as compared to untreated patients. Vaccination with mRNA-1273 resulted in a systematically 3.5-fold higher antibody level than with the BNT162b2 vaccine (p<0.001). Interpretation: In pwMS, anti-CD20 treatment and fingolimod led to a reduced humoral response to mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. As mRNA-1273 elicits 3.5-higher antibody levels than BNT162b2, this vaccine may be preferentially considered for patients under anti-CD20 treatment or fingolimod. Combining our data with those that will be produced by studying the cellular immune response to vaccines, and including clinical follow-up, will contribute to better define the most appropriate SARS-CoV-2 vaccine strategies in the context of DMTs and MS. At the time of the ECTRIMS presentation data on the full sample (about 2000 subjects) will be presented.

An analysis of main symptoms of COVID-19 in MS patients and related risk factors

Introduction: MS patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 disease may present with a wide pattern of symptoms, not always suggestive of the severity of infection. A recent study has shown that main symptoms of Covid-19 can be grouped in seven different clusters. Risk and protective factors for their occurrence in MS patients has never been investigated. Objectives: To identify the most common symptoms of Covid-19 that are part of specific clusters in MS patients and evaluate all factors associated with their manifestation. Methods: As part of the MuSC-19 Italian project, all data were extracted from a dedicated web-based platform that allows researchers to evaluate the impact of Covid-19 on people affected by MS. After having tested the degree of agreement between different types of symptoms (Cohen's k), univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were applied to identify predicting factors for each group. Results: 1554 MS patients with confirmed Covid-19 and presenting at least one symptom referred to a specific cluster were analyzed. Patients presented nearly three groups of symptoms (mean: 2.8). The most common include fever/chills/rigor/fatigue/ cough (87%), followed by ageusia/anosmia (46%). Smoking habit was the most confirmed risk factor for developing a wide range of symptoms: common cold-like symptoms (OR:1.6, 95%CI:1.3- 2.1;p<0.001), joint and muscle pain (OR:1.3, 95%CI:1.1-1.7;p=0.037), gastrointestinal problems (OR:1.3, 95%CI: 1.1-1.7;p = 0.029), and loss of smell/taste (OR:1.4, 95%CI: 1.07-1.72;p=0.013). Smoking was confirmed also as risk factor for increasing the number of symptoms (OR:1.5, 95%CI:1.2-1.8;p<0.001), together with alcohol use (OR:1.25, 95%CI:1.1-1.5;p=0.021) and with assumption of anti-CD20 therapies (OR:1.7, 95%CI:1.2-2.5;p=0.004). Males have a lower risk for developing a major number of symptoms (OR:0.8, 95%CI:0.6 - 0.9;p=0.006). Finally, a lower EDSS was associated to a slight increment of symptoms, probably due to an already underlying presence of some common symptoms in most critical MS patients, which consequently were not reported (OR:0.9, 95%CI:0.8-0.9;p=0.005). Conclusions: Knowing possible risk factors and modifying some lifestyle behaviors might minimize the occurrence of Covid-19 symptoms. Anyway, further studies are needed for confirming these findings, and an additional follow up study on the presence of persistent symptoms after apparent Covid-19 resolution may help to better understand all possible risk factors.

The impact of PM2.5 on COVID-19 severity among Italian MS patients

Introduction: Studies have pointed out that air pollution longterm exposure may play a role in the severity and prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Additionally, air pollution has been associated to MS prevalence and course. However, the role of air pollution in COVID-19 severity has never been explored specifically among MS patients. Aims: To explore the association between air pollution assessed by PM2.5 levels and COVID-19 severity among MS patients. Methods: Demographic and clinical characteristics as well as data about Covid-19 severity were extracted from an Italian webbased platform (Musc-19 project) containing clinician-reported data from 118 Italian MS centers. PM2.5 ground-level concentrations were derived from air quality model results, as provided by the 'Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service' (CAMS). Ordered logistic regression models were used to assess the association between PM2.5 (continuous and in tertiles) and Covid-19 prognosis (defined on three levels as mild course, hospitalization, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission or death) while controlling for possible confounders. Results: PM2.5 concentrations were available for 1517 MS patients, of whom 1321(87%) were classified as mild Covid-19 cases, 172(11%) were hospitalized and 24(2%) were admitted to ICU or died. Higher concentrations of PM2.5 were associated with increased odds of developing a worst Covid-19 prognosis (10-unit increase in PM2.5: OR(95% CI)=1.76(1.16-2.67) p-value=0.008;3rd vs 1st tertile: OR(95% CI)=1.74(1.17-2.59) p-value=0.006). Results remained consistent when we included only the Covid-19 cases confirmed by a nasopharyngeal swab (N=1087). Conclusions: Higher concentrations of PM2.5 are associated with Covid-19 severity among MS patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of other air pollutants, but urgent measures to reduce air pollution must be surely adopted.

Different disease modifying therapies can increase or decrease Covid-19 severity in Multiple Sclerosis

Objective: To describe the effect of disease modifying therapies (DMT) on Covid-19 severity in a large cohort of Italian patients with Covid-19 and multiple sclerosis (MS). Background: We previously presented data from a nationwide study of persons with MS with suspected or confirmed Covid-19, collected from March 2020. In June we started collecting also asymptomatic patients, when serological tests started to be routinely done. Design/Methods: This was a retrospective multi-center observational study. We defined Covid-19 severity as a 4-level variable: Level 1=asymptomatic, level 2=symptomatic without signs of pneumonia, level 3=radiologically defined pneumonia or hospitalization, level 4=intensive care unit (ICU) or death. We analysed the impact of baseline variables on this outcome by a multivariable ordinal logistic model quantifying the association by Odds Ratio (OR). Results: On October 12, we enrolled 902 MS patients, 298 (33%) with confirmed and 604 (67%) with suspected Covid-19;37 (4%) were asymptomatic. The number of ICU/deaths were 8/95 (8%) among those treated with anti-CD20 therapies (mean age=41 years), 0/84 (0%) among those treated with Interferon (mean age=47 years) and 37/723 (5%) among those treated with other drugs (mean age=43 years). Among the 37 asymptomatic patients, 7/84 (8.3%) were in Interferon, 1/95 (1.1%) was on anti-CD20 and 29/723 (4%) were on other drugs. At multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for a severe Covid-19 were age (OR=1.05, p<0.001), EDSS(OR=1.13, p=0.02), Male sex(OR=1.44, p=0.057) and DMT used: Treatment with anti-CD20 (Ocrelizumab or Rituximab) increased the risk (OR=1.99, p=0.035) and treatment with Interferon reduced the risk (OR=0.48, p=0.05) of severe Covid-19 as compared to treatment with DMF, used as the reference DMT. Conclusions: This analysis confirms on a larger population the increase of risk of severe Covid-19 of anti-CD20 therapies and highlights the protective role of Interferon. Data on asymptomatic patients are rapidly accumulating and will provide useful information about this.

Palliative care amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges and contributions

Objective: To analyze the scientific evidence on palliative care implementation amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: This is a scoping review based on the methodology proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Virtual Health Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EBSCO, Embase, PsycInfo (R) and Science Direct were analyzed using the descriptors "palliative care" and "coronavirus" and the keyword "COVID-19". Thirty studies were selected for analysis. Results: This review showed strategies for palliative care implementation using protocols and telemedicine, to facilitate communication, and showed how palliative therapy approach has been, revealing the need to promote comfort and welcoming patients and family members in times of pain and grief. Conclusion: The palliative care principles contribute to comprehensive care, but its implementation amidst the crisis is a challenge. It is important to provide conditions to apply it in the daily life of health services, even in pandemic scenarios.